As such, I do believe NBC.com's various synopses prior to the airdate would fall under this. Whereas, I believe (my opinion) that any detail (video, audio, tidbit, commentary) of an episode not yet revealed is a spoiler, particularly as even the little moments can be one of importance in the episode's context. All this is making me think on the defintion of a spoiler, which I do disagree with the SVU comm's take.Ĭonsidered any information giving away major plot points of future episodes.Ī NOTE: I'm going to say any information from NBC's website (ie: the episode synopses below) will not be considered a spoiler, however, any pictures from upcoming episodes will. Although, I think two weeks is plenty, especially for those who missed the episode/special circumstances/fear of being totally out of the loop. The lj-cut tag will be necessary to hide spoilers for the following 7 days after the episode aired.įair enough. Since they do their share of spoilers, I'm going by their standards. The lawandordersvu comm, which does its share of spoilers, says a week is enough. Spoilers are a necessary evil, but how long should the grace period of concealment be? A week, two, a month? In posting my recent Jack discussion entries this week, it made me realize about the shelf-life of spoilers.

Livejournal spoiler cut